Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the PUST program in FM by assessing the experience of the current residents on different aspects of the learning environment. Material and methods. In order to assess the experience of residents, a questionnaire was developed. It was based On internationally validated questionnaires, that used to evaluate similar programs [3; 4; 6; 2]. All the residents in the first and in the second year of the PUSTprogram in FM (total of 51 individuals) were invited to participate in the study. Furthermore, 20 FM interns from clinics in Dushanbe and neighboring districts were invited, in order to compare between FM residents inside and outside the PUST program. Results. The average score of residents of the 2-year PUST program in FM was 254.54 out of320 (79.5% of the maximum reachable score). This by 0.5 lower than an excellent score (80.0%). That indicates that the residents are positively perceiving the program, while there is still room for improvement in some fields. Conclusion. The residents of the 2-year PUST program in FM reported very high satisfaction and good experiences with the program, while only a few issues were encountered. The 2-year PUST program in FM scored significantly higher than the one-year Internship, especially in the categories related to the practical job and teaching. Residents of the 2-year program reported higher satisfaction with clinical exposure, skill development, and role autonomy during the practical job. Very good results were reached in the ratings of both, residents trained at the PGMI training base and residents trained in the district.