Minilaparotomy choledocholithotomy in patients with metabolic syndrome
https://doi.org/10.52888/0514-2515-2024-362-3-5-12
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the outcomes of mini-laparotomy choledocholithotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis and metabolic syndrome using “Mini-Assistant” instruments.
Materials and Methods. This study is based on the outcomes of surgical interventions performed on 54 patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis accompanied by metabolic syndrome, conducted between 2009 and 2022. A minimally invasive laparoscopic approach was utilized, employing “Mini-Assistant” instruments. Preoperative assessments included laboratory tests, ultrasound examination, electrocardiography, echocardiography, respiratory function testing, chest radiography, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The miniaccess operation was performed using a transrectal incision, 6-7 cm in length. The technical steps of the operation were similar to traditional cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy.
Results. The average duration of the procedure was 68 ± 9.3 minutes. The patients’ condition before and after surgery was satisfactory, with stable hemodynamics. No hypertensive crises or tachycardia were observed. No mortality was reported. Postoperative complications were observed in three patients, including accumulation of serous fluid in the subcutaneous tissue (2 cases) and postoperative pancreatitis (1 case). The average length of hospital stay after choledocholithotomy via mini-access was 6 ± 1.6 days.
Conclusion. Mini-laparotomy choledocholithotomy using the “Mini-Assistant” instrument set allows for avoiding conventional, more invasive techniques, facilitating effective surgical intervention even in cases where laparoscopic procedures are not feasible.
About the Authors
Sh. Sh. AmonovTajikistan
Shukhrat Sh. Amonov - Doctor of Medical Sciences; Surgeon at the Republican Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery; Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Surgical Diseases No. 2 named after. N.U. Usmanov, SEI Avicenna Tajik State Medical University.
Phone: +992918761013
S. Sh. Musoev
Tajikistan
M. O. Olimi
Tajikistan
References
1. Avalueva E.B. Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya i drugie metody meditsinskoy vizualizatsii v diagnostike zhelchnokamennoy bolezni [Magnetic resonance imaging and other medical imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cholelithiasis]. Eksperimentalnaya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya - Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology, 2021, No. 12 (196), pp. 28-34.
2. Mukhiddinov N.D. Miniinvazivnye metody diagnostiki i khirurgicheskogo lecheniya zhelchekamennoy bolezni i mekhanicheskoy zheltukhi [Minimally invasive methods of diagnostics and surgical treatment of cholelithiasis and mechanical jaundice]. Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk Tadzhikistana - Bulletin of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Tajikistan, 2019, No. 3 (31), pp. 279-283.
3. Mukhiddinov N.D. Videolaparoskopicheskaya kholetsistektomiya s kholedokholitotomiey pri zhelchekamennoy bolezni, oslozhnennoy mekhanicheskoy zheltukhoy [Video laparoscopic cholecystectomy with choledocholithotomy for cholelithiasis complicated by mechanical jaundice]. Problemy gastroenterologii - Problems of Gastroenterology, 2020, No. 3-4 (76), pp. 16-21.
4. Mamchich V.I. Magnitno-rezonansnaya kholangiopankreatografiya v diagnostike kholedokholitiaza [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis]. Khirurgiya Ukrainy - Surgery of Ukraine, 2009, No. 4, pp. 47-50.
5. Makhmadov F.I. Vybor miniinvazivnoy taktiki lecheniya kholedokholitiaza u bolnykh s ozhireniem [Choice of minimally invasive tactics for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in obese patients]. Vestnik poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya v sfere zdravookhraneniya - Bulletin of Postgraduate Education in the Healthcare Sphere, 2022, No. 2, pp. 44-51.
6. Usmanov N.U. Ostryy kholetsistit i soputstvuyushchiy metabolicheskiy sindrom v khirurgii [Acute cholecystitis and associated metabolic syndrome in surgery]. Vestnik Avitsenny – Avicenna Bulletin, 2011, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 123-129.
7. Khamdamov I.B. Sovremennoe predstavlenie o zhelchnokamennoy bolezni, diagnostiki i metodakh khirurgicheskogo lecheniya [Current understanding of cholelithiasis, diagnosis and methods of surgical treatment]. Biologiya i integrativnaya meditsina - Biology and Integrative Medicine, pp. 15.
8. Kiewiet J.J., Leeuwenburgh M.M., Bipat S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology, 2012, No. 264 (3), pp. 708-720.
9. Lammert F., Gurusamy K., Ko C.W. Gallstones. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2016, No. 2, pp. 16024.
10. Zhang Zh., Yang N., Qian J. Risk factors for bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis and the role of prophylactic antibiotics. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2013, No. 17 (9), pp. 1689-1697.
Review
For citations:
Amonov Sh.Sh., Musoev S.Sh., Olimi M.O. Minilaparotomy choledocholithotomy in patients with metabolic syndrome. Health care of Tajikistan. 2024;(3):5-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52888/0514-2515-2024-362-3-5-12