Results of an empirical study based on the examination and interviews of patients using fixed orthopedic structures made from materials with various composite structures
https://doi.org/10.52888/0514-2515-2024-363-4-54-58
Abstract
Aim. To assess the clinical characteristics and epidemiological status of patients with fixed prosthetic restorations made from various composite materials.
Material and methods. A sociological survey was conducted among 787 patients treated at Dushanbe City Dental Clinic No. 3 and the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry at the Medical-Social Institute of Tajikistan. A total of 1032 prosthetic restorations were analyzed. Statistical processing of the data was performed using the LDS Basis chromatograph computing module.
Research and discussion. The epidemiological study revealed the following distribution of prosthetic restorations: stamped steel crowns — 629 units (60.94%), gold crowns — 149 units (14.43%), silver-palladium alloy crowns — 51 units (4.94%), metal-ceramic crowns — 71 units (6.88%), and metal-plastic crowns — 132 units (12.79%) of the total restorations.
Conclusions. Steel crowns are used significantly more often than other materials (p<0.05), particularly in older patients, due to their affordability and durability. Gold and metal-ceramic crowns are chosen mainly by middle-aged patients for their aesthetic and functional properties. Silver-palladium alloy crowns and metal-plastic restorations are used less frequently.
About the Author
G. H. Kurbonova
NEI “Medical-Social Institute of Tajikistan”
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Kurbonova Gulnoz Khoshimovna - Postgraduate student at the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
Tel: +992918434377
References
1. Andreev V.A. Vliyanie kompozitsionnykh materialov na prochnostnye kharakteristiki nesemnykh protezov [Influence of composite materials on the strength characteristics of fixed dentures]. Stomatologiya - Stomatology, 2019, No. 2, pp. 45-52.
2. Belyaev S.P. Otsenka klinicheskoy effektivnosti nesemnykh ortopedicheskikh konstruktsiy razlichnykh tipov [Evaluation of clinical effectiveness of fixed orthopaedic constructions of different types]. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal - Russian Journal of Dentistry, 2020, No. 4, pp. 33-38.
3. Vasilev A.M. Biologicheskaya sovmestimost ortopedicheskikh materialov [Biological compatibility of orthopaedic materials]. Moscow, Meditsina Publ., 2018. 210 p.
4. Gavrilov D.N. Osobennosti primeneniya kompozitnykh sistem v nesemnom protezirovanii [Peculiarities of composite systems in fixed prosthetics]. Vestnik ortopedicheskoy stomatologii - Herald of Orthopedic Dentistry, 2017, No. 3, pp. 12-19.
5. Ivanov I.P. Epidemiologicheskiy analiz ispolzovaniya raznykh grupp materialov v nesemnykh protezakh [Epidemiological analysis of the use of different material groups in fixed prostheses]. Stomatologicheskaya praktika - Dental Practice, 2021, No. 1, pp. 22-27.
6. Kuznetsov O.L. Volokonno-armirovannye materialy v protezirovanii zubov: novye vozmozhnosti [Fibrereinforced materials in dental prosthetics: new possibilities]. Prakticheskaya stomatologiya - Practical Dentistry, 2016, No. 5, pp. 55-61.
7. Pavlov Yu.N. [Long-term performance of fixed structures: a comparative analysis of different materials]. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Aktualnye voprosy stomatologii» [Materials of the scientific-practical conference ‘Actual issues of stomatology’]. Moscow, MGMSU Publ., 2019, pp. 88-93. (In Russ.)
8. Sidorov P.V. Kachestvo zhizni patsientov s nesemnymi protezami na osnove kompozitnykh materialov [Quality of life of patients with fixed prostheses based on composite materials]. Stomatologiya i implantologiya - Dentistry and Implantology, 2022, No. 2, pp. 40-48.
Review
For citations:
Kurbonova G.H. Results of an empirical study based on the examination and interviews of patients using fixed orthopedic structures made from materials with various composite structures. Health care of Tajikistan. 2024;(4):54-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52888/0514-2515-2024-363-4-54-58
Views:
153
Email this article 