Improving treatment strategies for recurrent classic trigeminal neuralgia
https://doi.org/10.52888/0514-2515-2025-365-2-11-18
Abstract
Objective: to study the pathogenesis of recurrent classical trigeminal neuralgia and to improve the methods of its treatment.
Material and methods: the study included 20 patients of various ages, with a predominance of female participants, diagnosed with recurrent neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve based on MRI findings. 17 patients underwent microvascular decompression surgery. To enhance treatment efficacy and reduce recurrence rates, complete separation and isolation of the nerve root were performed using a Teflon pad, TachoComb hemostatic sponge, and adipose tissue.
Results: postoperatively, all operated patients (100%) experienced complete resolution of pain. Three patients were identified as having a neuropathic pain component and responded well to conservative therapy. Surgical efficacy was assessed objectively by the absence of facial pain. Additional assessment tools included the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Scale (BNI-PS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The average postoperative follow-up period was 1.5 years, during which no patient reported recurrence of facial pain.
Conclusions: the most common cause of recurrent neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve was postoperative adhesion formation. Other frequent causes include inadequate isolation of the nerve from cerebral vascular structures and displacement of the Teflon implant. To reduce recurrence rates, it is essential to prevent postoperative adhesions at the surgical site and to ensure complete separation and reliable insulation of the nerve not only from the compressing vessel but also from adjacent cerebral structures, including neighboring cranial nerves.
About the Authors
F. I. BotirovTajikistan
Botirov Farrukh Ikromovich – 1st year PhD student, Department of Neurosurgery and combined injuries
Dushanbe
H. .J. Rakhmonov
Tajikistan
Khurshed Jamshed Rakhmonzoda – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head
Dushanbe
Z. B. Odinaeva
Tajikistan
Zukhal Bakhtiyorovna Odinaeva – Assistant department of Neurosurgery and combined injuries
Dushanbe
References
1. Lazarchuk D.M., Alekseev G.N., Kamadey O.O., Chemidronov S.N. Microvascular decompression in the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga Region. 2019;(1- 2):101-106. (In Russ)
2. Reveguk E.A., Karpov S.M. Actual problems of trigeminal neuralgia in neurology. Achievements of modern natural science. 2013;(9). (In Russ)
3. Giorgio Cruccu. Trigeminal neuralgia New classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. 2016;(87):220–228.
4. Yoshino N., Akimoto H., Yamada I., Nagaoka T., Tetsumura A., Kurabayashi T., et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: Evaluation of neuralgic manifestation and site of neurovascular compression with 3D CISS MR imaging and MR angiography. Radiology. 2003;228(2):539-545.
5. Cole C.D., Liu J.K., Apfelbaum R.I. Historical perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(5):4.
6. Ruiz-Juretschke F., González-Quarante L.H., GarcíaLeal R., Martínez de Vega V. Neurovascular relations of the trigeminal nerve in asymptomatic individuals studied with high-resolution threedimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2019; 302(4):639-645.
7. Joanna M. Zakrzewska L., Mark E. Linskey. Trigeminal neuralgia. Drugs Aging. 2014;348:474
8. Rzaev D.A., Moisak G.I., Amelina E.V. Surgical treatment for facial pain. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2018;20(1):33-48. (In Russ)
9. Pereira A., Gitlin M.J., Gross R.A, et al. Suicidality associated with antiepileptic drugs: Implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013;154:345–349.
10. Mun Seng Chong. Guidelines for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2023,90 (6)355-362;
11. Cruccu G., Gronseth G., Alksne J., et al. AAN-EFNS guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management. European Journal of Neurology. 2008;15(10):1013– 1028.
12. Sindou M., Leston J., Decullier E., Chapuis F. Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. Journal of Neurosurgary. 2007;107(6):1144-53.
13. Tatli M., Satici O., Kanpolat Y., Sindou M.Various surgical modalities for trigeminal neuralgia:literature study of respective long-term outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150:243–55.
14. Sekula R.F.Jr., Frederickson A.M., Jannetta P.J. et al. Microvascular decompression after failed Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a safe and effective rescue therapy/ Journal of Neurosurgary. 2010;113(1):45-52.
15. Heros R.C. Results of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Journal of Neurosurgary. 2009;110:617–619.
Review
For citations:
Botirov F.I., Rakhmonov H..., Odinaeva Z.B. Improving treatment strategies for recurrent classic trigeminal neuralgia. Health care of Tajikistan. 2025;(2):11-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52888/0514-2515-2025-365-2-11-18